[pp-org] INDECT - europejski NSA

Halbersztadt Jozef (jothal) jozef.halbersztadt w gmail.com
Śro, 2 Kwi 2014, 20:51:52 CEST


 Myśmy zajmowali się INDECTEM ze względu na wiodąca rolę AGH. Nieskutecznie
jako ISOC-PL. Bardziej skutecznie jako Panoptykon. Panoptykonowi oferowano
miejsce w tej Radzie Etyki. Co było pewnym wyzwaniem. Po przemyśleniach
ustaliśmy zasadę, że nie będziemy przyjmować żadnych propozycji, które
wiążą się z tajnością.

 Jeśli chodzi o sam INDECT. Jest to raczej skromny program, który
prawdopodobnie stanowi przykrycie dla bardziej poważnych przedsięwzięć w
tej branży.

 Tu jest ocena jednego z bardziej znanych ekspertów, Bena Hayesa z
Statewatch

http://www.opendemocracy.net/ben-hayes/clean-it-secret-eu-surveillance-plan-that-wasn%E2%80%99t

A few years ago news surfaced of an EU-funded initiative called INDECT. It
was reported in much the same way as CLEAN IT.* INDECT had received €12
million from the €1.4 billion EU security research programme* and claimed
it would help develop the surveillance equivalents of GM foods, stem cell
research and ‘fracking’.

 INDECT promised to develop face recognition, internet surveillance, smart
CCTV and drones as part of suite of “threat detection tools”. People began
to question the project’s credibility when it produced this terrible PR
video, but by this time the cat was out of the bag and activists were
telling the world that INDECT was building drones for FRONTEX (the EU
border police), databases for EUROPOL (the EU police office) and targeting
protest groups – *none of which was actually true* (ironically, an array of
other little noticed EU-funded projects have effectively been doing just
that). The widespread exaggeration and misrepresentation culminated in this
hopelessly inaccurate video from Anonymous, which claimed that INDECT was
about to be piloted at the London 2012 Olympics


On 2 April 2014 18:01, Władysław Majewski <wladek.majewski w gmail.com> wrote:

> Przed czytaniem zaleca się profilaktyczne przygotowanie środków
> przeciwymiotnych.
>
> <mindset = ironic>
>
> AGH University of Science and Technology received the prestigious award of
> the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, which was granted for
> a particular activity in promotion of inventions on international arena in
> 2013.
>
> Presentation of diplomas and statuettes was held on the 11th February
> 2014 in Copernicus Science Centre (Warsaw) during the opening of “XXI Stock
> Exchange Inventions awarded on international exhibitions and fairs
> innovation in 2013”.
> (cytat za
> http://www.indect-project.eu/events/global/agh-university-of-science-and-technology-awarded-by-the-polish-ministry-of-science-and-higher-education-for-promotion-of-polish-inventions)
>
> Ethical issues
> All of the research activities within INDECT project are carried out so as
> to ensure the appropriate balance between the protection of the rights of
> the individual and the protection of society. (...)
>
> The main objective of INDECT research is to make the monitoring and search
> process (and procedures) more automatic. (...)  The value that will be
> added by deployment of INDECT research outcomes is that existing systems
> would operate with less human intervention, which will lower the level of
> subjective assessment and the number of human mistakes. This means less
> staff will be required for supervision of surveillance activities (e.g.
> monitoring of CCTV camera networks). This will resulting in less
> opportunities for illegitimate use of such information, or for human error
> to result in violations of the rights of the individual.(...)
>
> The algorithms that are under research are intended to be used solely in
> cases where this is justified.(...)
>
> The sentence: “if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear”
> is only true if every aspect of the criminal justice system works
> perfectly, on every occasion. Tools based on INDECT project research
> outcomes will provide EU Member States with the technology to ensure that
> decisions around public safety are based on the maximum amount of relevant
> information available.(...)
>
> Signed: INDECT Research Project Ethics Board
>
> FAQ
>
> *Q1.3: What behaviour is an “abnormal” behaviour?*
>
> A: As regards the definition of “abnormal behaviour”, the term is not
> introduced by the INDECT Project, and it was formulated in the FP7 Work
> Programme. This term can be understood differently depending on a context.
> In our case we clearly understand abnormal behaviour as the one related to
> a threat or “criminal behaviour”, and especially as behaviour related to
> serious criminal activities (e.g.: robberies, distribution of child
> pornography, etc.).
> </mindset>
> <break for deep breath>
>
> Pytanie: czy prowadzenie badań i prac rozwojowych, które wymagają
> powołanie specjalnego zespołu zajmującego się propagandą jego poprawności
> etycznej, jest zachowanie wyczerpującym definicję zachowań nie mieszczących
> się w normie?
>
>
>
> W dniu 2 kwietnia 2014 13:50 użytkownik mch-wie Gazeta.pl <
> mch-wie w gazeta.pl> napisał:
>
>> Projekt zapoczatkowany w 2009, przewidywany koniec na czerwiec 2014
>> http://www.indect-project.eu/
>> Pozdrawiam, M.Ch.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Org mailing list
>> Org w partiapiratow.org
>> http://listy.partiapiratow.org/mailman/listinfo/org
>> http://polskapartiapiratow.pl/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> W Majewski
>
> _______________________________________________
> Org mailing list
> Org w partiapiratow.org
> http://listy.partiapiratow.org/mailman/listinfo/org
> http://polskapartiapiratow.pl/
>

<http://www.isoc.org.pl>
-------------- następna część ---------
Załącznik HTML został usunięty...
URL:  <http://listy.partiapiratow.org/pipermail/org/attachments/20140402/65d218ce/attachment-0001.html>


Więcej informacji o liście Org